W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: Content negotiation and Vary (1.3, 12, 13.5, 14.43)

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 1996 13:05:04 -0700
To: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <9606031305.aa19516@paris.ics.uci.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/754
> Just a thought -- now that we have the "representation" word (which I
> like), isn't what gets negotiated the representation, not the content?
> I.e., we could replace "content negotiation" with "representation
> negotiation" everywhere.

Because what is going on is negotiation of which representation is
included within the content of the response.  I don't think that
replacing the now-common terminology with something fairly circular
would help much; in any case, I think negotiation is pretty much done
now and we should shift our focus to other things that need it more.

Received on Monday, 3 June 1996 13:27:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC