W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: Section 3.2.2

From: <jg@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 31 May 96 22:26:04 -0400
Message-Id: <9606010226.AA06270@zorch.w3.org>
To: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
Cc: "'http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com'" <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/674

I agree, so I've removed the note about TCP; it also had a normative requirement,
that was questionable (particularly in a note).  I guess the
real requirement is HTTP url's being accessable via DNS, but being
quiet seems like the best strategy given IPV6 coming down the tubes.
			- Jim
Received on Friday, 31 May 1996 19:30:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC