W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996


From: Ted Hardie <hardie@merlot.arc.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 11:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199605311822.LAA04488@merlot.arc.nasa.gov>
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/621
I note that there has been a justification added for declaring that a
last-byte-pos in byte range after the end of the entity should be read
as naming the end of the entity, but I don't think the justification
fully answers the objections raised in:


and re-iterated in


My objections are not strong enough to want to raise a big fuss over
this--I think the current design risks semantic transparency in a
small number of cases to reduce round trips in an equally small number
of cases--but I would be interested in hearing any further arguments
which the editorial group might have heard in favor of this language.

					Ted Hardie
Received on Friday, 31 May 1996 11:24:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC