- From: Dave Kristol <dmk@allegra.att.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 May 96 12:14:34 EDT
- To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Can we eliminate the double negatives in the first bullet list? Proposed new wording: ... the protocol requires that transparency may be relaxed only if + there is an explicit protocol-level request (when relaxed by client or origin server) + there is a way to warn the end user (when relaxed by cache or client) Dave Kristol
Received on Monday, 13 May 1996 09:21:14 UTC