W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

v11-03 COMMENT: 16.1 Semantic Transparency

From: Dave Kristol <dmk@allegra.att.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 96 12:14:34 EDT
Message-Id: <9605131614.AA09314@zp.tempo.att.com.tempo.att.com>
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/467
Can we eliminate the double negatives in the first bullet list?
Proposed new wording:

... the protocol requires that transparency may be relaxed only if

+ there is an explicit protocol-level request (when relaxed by client or
	origin server)
+ there is a way to warn the end user (when relaxed by cache or client)

Dave Kristol
Received on Monday, 13 May 1996 09:21:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC