W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: EDITS for Section 5 (Request) (Was: Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 02 May 1996 13:11:26 -0400
Message-Id: <9605021711.AA09775@www18.w3.org>
To: Dave Kristol <dmk@allegra.att.com>
Cc: fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/425
Dave Kristol writes:

> Furthermore, I have assumed that HTTP/2.0 would not be ASCII-based, so
> it doesn't make sense to talk about sending an absoluteURI to a 2.0
> server.

I don't think there will be a non-ASCII based protocol ready for version 2.0. 
The current transition path I see is to have a 2.0 with support for underlying 
multiplexing but still ASCII based. The main problem is to get persistent 
connections efficient enough to dramatically reduce the perceived time to 
render. Before this happens we can not tell people to seriously reduce the 
amount of open connections pr Web application.


Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, <frystyk@w3.org>
World-Wide Web Consortium, MIT/LCS NE43-356
545 Technology Square, Cambridge MA 02139, USA
Received on Thursday, 2 May 1996 10:17:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC