W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1996

Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.

From: John Franks <john@math.nwu.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 09:25:19 -0500 (CDT)
To: Jim Gettys <jg@w3.org>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960430092209.15504F-100000@hopf.math.nwu.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/391
On Tue, 30 Apr 1996, Jim Gettys wrote:

> Koen suggested "plain resource" rather than "specific resource".  I
> accepted this suggestion, as it got us out of various regarding the use
> of specific elsewhere in the document, and it has the right connotation.

Consider "simple resource" versus "compound resource".

> Jeff suggested "resourcelet" as a place-holder for what Roy called
> "resource entity".  While not happy with resource entity, I ended up
> even less happy with resourcelet.  So I'm going with resource entity

I am bothered by the fact that a "resource entity" is not an "entity."
(That is correct isn't it?)  Given this I think "resourcelet" is better.

John Franks 	Dept of Math. Northwestern University
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 1996 07:29:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:16 UTC