jg@w3.org: > >I guess I'm less concerned about "violating the request/response model >of HTTP". Then again, I've designed two previous streaming protocol based >systems :-). > >The above looks like another possibility that is not a band-aid solution. >I'm happy either with a general null-request solution, or with recrafting >7.2.2. I am unhappy with any solution that would either hack individual >methods, or be version dependent or depend too much on the details of >the transport connection state. How about this: Full-Request = Request-Line ; Section 5.1 *( General-Header ; Section 4.3 | Request-Header ; Section 5.2 | Entity-Header ) ; Section 7.1 CRLF [ Entity-Body ] ; Section 7.2 [ CRLF ] ^^^^^^^^ Together with a text Clients SHOULD NOT include the optional CRLF at the end of a request, but servers MUST be tolerant of clients which do include this CRLF. Note: Many existing HTTP/1.0 clients add a CRLF at the end of a POST request. Koen.Received on Wednesday, 24 April 1996 13:39:26 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:51 EDT