W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1996

Re: cookie draft available

From: Daniel DuBois <ddubois@spyglass.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 08:55:00 -0500
Message-Id: <>
To: hedlund@best.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/282
At 02:51 PM 4/21/96 -0700, M. Hedlund wrote:
>My argument was that no one would be happy if an OS started wiping out
>preferences files when some internal limit was reached; nor should we
>specify that cookies be wiped out just because some magic number is

But this is totally an implmentation issue.  If someone sells a PDA that
only stores 3 cookies, they're going to get burned in the market.  There's
no need for protocol designers to tell PDA vendors how to build their systems.

But, assuming we're going to mention it anyway, I think a SHOULD is more
appropriate that a MUST.

the Programmer formerly known as Dan          
Received on Monday, 22 April 1996 07:02:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:16 UTC