W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1996

Re: PERSIST: headers needed at all?

From: John Franks <john@math.nwu.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 09:08:08 -0500 (CDT)
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Cc: Dave Kristol <dmk@allegra.att.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960416090545.16996C-100000@hopf.math.nwu.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/236
On Mon, 15 Apr 1996, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

> One problem is that there is a cost associated with holding a
> connection open on the server.  If the client knows that it will
> not be reusing the connection after the current request, then not
> asking for persistence means that the server can switch its process
> resources to a new connection immediately after sending the last
> response (as opposed to waiting for the close or timeout from the
> client). 

Perhaps there could be a "Connection: non-persistant" header.  It makes
sense to have the most common situation be the default (requiring no
header) and add a header for the exceptional or at less common behavior.

John Franks 	Dept of Math. Northwestern University
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 1996 07:12:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:16 UTC