>>> charset = "US-ASCII" >>> | "ISO-8859-1" | "ISO-8859-2" | "ISO-8859-3" >>> | "ISO-8859-4" | "ISO-8859-5" | "ISO-8859-6" >>> | "ISO-8859-7" | "ISO-8859-8" | "ISO-8859-9" >>> | "ISO-2022-JP" | "ISO-2022-JP-2" | "ISO-2022-KR" >>> | "UNICODE-1-1-UTF-8" > > Listing these charsets by name seems like a slippery slope to me. For > example, the brand new RFC 1922 describes ISO-2022-CN and ISO-2022-CN-EXT, > which will probably appear in the IANA registry around the same time we get > this spec out, if not sooner. This is a chicken and egg issue. We wouldn't need a list in HTTP if there were a list of short, charset-friendly, preferred names kept by IANA. However, there isn't. ...Roy T. Fielding Department of Information & Computer Science (fielding@ics.uci.edu) University of California, Irvine, CA 92717-3425 fax:+1(714)824-4056 http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/Received on Monday, 8 April 1996 19:03:20 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:50 EDT