W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1996

Re: (INTEGOK) rough consensus

From: <TROTH@ua1vm.ua.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 96 11:09:22 CST
Message-Id: <199604022338.AA079758299@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/163
        To compute an MD5 signature for textual material,
I would like to see the following applied:

            o   trailing white space stripped

            o   remaining whitespace reduced to single blanks

            o   CR/LF ignored

        The justification for this is that something cut-n-pasted
should still pass.   No,  we're not going to splice the TCP stream
and insert cut-n-pasted text,  but the above will make digests work on
the widest range of interoperable platforms.  What I'm saying is that
cut-n-paste-ability isn't the goal,  it represents a sample of the
kind of mangling that might happen when the text crosses some boundaries.
Interoperability is the goal.   Make MD5 verification work cross-platform.

Rick Troth <troth@casita.houston.tx.us>, Houston, Texas, USA
Received on Tuesday, 2 April 1996 15:43:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:16 UTC