W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1996

Re: About that Host: header....

From: Ari Luotonen <luotonen@netscape.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 21:27:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199603190527.VAA18381@step.mcom.com>
To: jg@w3.org
Cc: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no, klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net, ari@netscape.com, paulle@microsoft.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, Jeff Treuhaft <jeff@step.mcom.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/28

> Discussion:
> I personally see only options 2 and 4 having a high likelyhood of
> the "correct outcome" allowing multiple sites to be served from the
> same server, within finite time of starting to transition to 1.1.  I
> believe the W.G. needs to select either 2 or 4 to resolve this
> issue.
> There was a statement by Ari Luotonen at the IETF meeting that he
> believed that solution 2) to be unacceptable to Netscape.  Ari, is
> this true now that you've had time to think about it?  Paul, can you
> see what Microsoft's opinion on this topic is?

Yes, 2 is unacceptable.  We'd be breaking the entire universe, or
making an ugly kludge if we then require a retry with 1.0 if and when
the server doesn't accept the 1.1 request.  Furthermore, HTTP/1.x is
defined to be backword and forward compatible with other HTTP/1.x, so
even in that light this would be unacceptable, because a valid
HTTP/1.1 request would not yield a correct response from a HTTP/1.0

Making the Host: header a _required_ header in HTTP/1.1 clearly solves
the problem, and is painless, with no interoperability problems.  How
you choose to enforce it I don't really have a strong opinion about
(error msg vs ignore); I don't think an error response should be
required from servers that don't exploit the Host: header, but it
would be fine for servers that serve multiple domains.

Ari Luotonen				ari@netscape.com
Netscape Communications Corp.		http://home.netscape.com/people/ari/
685 East Middlefield Road
Mountain View, CA 94043, USA		Netscape Server Development Team
Received on Monday, 18 March 1996 21:31:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:16 UTC