W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1996

RE: ISSUES LIST: Chunked Encoding

From: Henry Sanders (Exchange) <henrysa@exchange.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 16:13:52 -0800
Message-Id: <c=US%a=_%p=Microsoft%l=ROADKILL-960316001352Z-8937@yuri.microsoft.com>
To: "'hardie@nasa.gov'" <hardie@nasa.gov>, "'http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com'" <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'hallam@w3.org'" <hallam@w3.org>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/14
>Why can't people simply agree with *me* in order to move the spec

I agree with Phil. There seems to be this belief that removing footers
make implementation of chunked easier and cause 1.1 to converge faster. 
Maybe I'm not too bright, but I don't see that. What exactly is the
problem with footers?

Received on Friday, 15 March 1996 18:08:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:16 UTC