W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1996

what's with the renaming

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 23:26:51 PST
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <96Feb24.232657pst.2733@golden.parc.xerox.com>
I am trying to enforce some process requirements. As I tried to
indicate earlier, please do not submit drafts to "Internet-Drafts"
without checking:

Documents are only accepted as working group drafts after there's been
some general agreement that we are considering the issue.  Document
authors must commit to responding to critiques of the wording in the
document and revising the group's documents in a timely fashion, and
summarize the changes as documents get revised.  Unless there are
extenuating circumstances, document editors are expected to attend
IETF meetings.

I believe that the issue Phill is trying to address is an important
one, and would personally support that we take up this question soon.
I'm more concerned that we do so with foreknowledge, a full
consideration of the problems that we're solving, some coordination
with other efforts, and a commitment to actually participate in the

If you have any questions or protests, please let me know.

Received on Saturday, 24 February 1996 23:28:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:16 UTC