W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1996

Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?

From: Shel Kaphan <sjk@amazon.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 19:35:16 -0800
Message-Id: <199602240335.TAA04561@bert.amazon.com>
To: Dave Long <dave@navisoft.com>
Cc: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Dave Long writes:
 > >>semantically equivalent to a CREATE.  For now I'm using a "magic"
 > >
 > >Why isn't put of a non-existent object good enough?
 > It *is* good enough.
 > I was referring to a problem which arose in the context of
 > version-control, where one might wish a PUT request to fail
 > if there was an existing (possibly very recently created)
 > object.
 > That problem is probably outside the scope of this working-group;
 > perhaps I shouldn't have piggy-backed it upon my reply to a
 > different issue.
 > -Dave

It seems to me to be very much in the domain of this working group,
and has been discussed before, in connection with conditional requests
of all sorts.  There was a discussion about "unless-modified-since"
(or "if-valid") headers some time back, to make the action of PUT
conditional on the server's version still being the same as the most
recent one the PUTter had received.  I don't think this has been
fully worked out yet.

Received on Friday, 23 February 1996 19:40:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:16 UTC