>>semantically equivalent to a CREATE. For now I'm using a "magic" > >Why isn't put of a non-existent object good enough? It *is* good enough. I was referring to a problem which arose in the context of version-control, where one might wish a PUT request to fail if there was an existing (possibly very recently created) object. That problem is probably outside the scope of this working-group; perhaps I shouldn't have piggy-backed it upon my reply to a different issue. -DaveReceived on Friday, 23 February 1996 14:47:56 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:46 EDT