W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1996

Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation

From: Keld J|rn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 16:42:33 +0100
Message-Id: <199601311542.QAA17714@dkuug.dk>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@stonehand.com>
Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, yergeau@alis.ca, Dan.Oscarsson@malmo.trab.se, html-wg@fssun09.dev.oclc.org, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, maits@dkuug.dk, uri@bunyip.com
Glenn Adams writes:

> 
> From: keld@dkuug.dk (Keld J|rn Simonsen)
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 23:14:43 +0100
> 
>   ... for example big-5 is not covered by ISO 10646 ...
> 
> Why do you say this?  I have a mapping table from BIG5 to 10646.
> BIG5 was one of the source sets used by the original CJK-JRG in
> developing the Unified CJK Repertoire 1.0 which went into Unicode 1.0
> and then into 10646.
> 
> Perhaps you are confusing BIG5 with the new version of CNS 11643,
> which, indeed, is not fully covered by 10646 (although the previous
> 1986 version of CNS 11643 was covered).

I may have been confusing it with CNS 11643. There is one of the
big character sets that covers something like 90.000 characters,
this was the one I meant. Sorry for the confusion. The problem still
exist that not all characters of the world is in ISO 10646.

Keld
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 1996 15:14:31 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:44 EDT