W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1996

Re: Charsets revisited

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 15:41:43 -0500
Message-Id: <9601242041.AA11096@www20>
To: Nickolay Saukh <nms@nns.ru>
Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Nickolay Saukh writes:
> > b) there is no body in a GET method, and no reason to add one;
> So, the question about charset for query in URI left open?

I think the problem is that it is not in the scope of this working group to 
solve the generic question about URIs and charsets. I would prefer a clear 
reference to the URI documents instead (even though they in turn may not be 
clear). Larry is of course right in that form data in a body part doesn't 
belong in a GET method.


Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, <frystyk@w3.org>
World-Wide Web Consortium, MIT/LCS NE43-356
545 Technology Square, Cambridge MA 02139, USA
Received on Wednesday, 24 January 1996 12:46:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:16 UTC