W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1996

Re: elaboration on MIME and HTTP issue

From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 21:22:54 -0500
Message-Id: <199601190222.VAA03269@ebt-inc.ebt.com>
To: masinter@parc.xerox.com
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
>> It is recommended that the character set of an entity body be
>> labelled as the lowest common denominator of the character codes
>> used within a document, with the exception that no label is
>> preferred over the labels US-ASCII or ISO-8859-1.
>As we've seen, current practice is really that the recipient guesses
>the character set if it isn't labelled. And we've already recommended
>that parameters not be used, so we shouldn't then turn around and
>recommend that the character set be labelled.

It is absolutely vital that content be correctly labelled. I cannot
put it strongly enough. Many interoperability problems spring from
this one lack in servers.

In the current Netscape, I can set a preference about encodings, and if I
choose "Japanese, auto-detect", not only do I get ugly fonts for my
ISO-8859-1 text, but some IS0-8859-1 get mapped to inappropriate
glyphs at display time. On the other hand, if I set it to ISO-8859-1,
then my Japanes text comes out looking like garbage.
Received on Thursday, 18 January 1996 18:26:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:16 UTC