W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1996

Re: Round 2: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational

From: Paul Hoffman <paulh@imc.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 00:02:26 -0500
Message-Id: <v02140400ad1a46f3da3a@[]>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
>#  This specification reflects the approximate state of those features
>#  which are normally found in most HTTP/1.0 implementations. The
>#  specification is split into two sections. Those features of HTTP
>#  for which implementations are usually consistent are described in
>#  the main body of this document. Those features which have few
>#  implementations or inconsistent ones are listed in Appendix D.

This wording works fine for me, if you're pretty sure the RFC editor or
someone else in the process will add the 'This specification is for
informational purposes only' line.

># The URI in a POST request identifies the resource that will handle
># the enclosed entity as data to be processed, e.g., values from a
># form that has been filled out.

This is also fine by my reading. It seems clearer than "appendage".

--Paul Hoffman
--Internet Mail Consortium
Received on Thursday, 11 January 1996 09:04:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:16 UTC