W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1996

Re: Where should Digest go next?

From: Paul Hoffman <paulh@imc.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 1996 19:06:53 -0800
Message-Id: <v02140402ad10f205a73e@[165.227.10.43]>
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
At 6:26 PM 1/3/96, Larry Masinter wrote:
>3- Submit as Informational, as part of HTTP/1.0
>. . .
>The problem with option 3 is that it would delay the (already late)
>HTTP/1.0 spec.

Further, it was not implemented in many places, so it isn't really
appropriate for the 1.0 draft. Worse yet, the Internet-Draft for it has
expired and isn't available on the IETF server.

I think that it isn't really part of what people think of as HTTP 1.0, and
shouldn't be included in the 1.0 draft.

--Paul Hoffman
--Internet Mail Consortium
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 1996 19:08:28 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:42 EDT