W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1995

review of byte range draft: please reply

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 13:17:09 PST
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <95Dec29.131719pst.2733@golden.parc.xerox.com>
As far as I can tell, the current members of the 'range retrieval'
review subgroup (Ari Luotonen and Steve Zilles) are content with 

         draft-luotonen-http-url-byterange-02.txt

and do not plan to do any additional work on the proposal or any
elements of range retrieval that might be in the current HTTP/1.1
draft, or review to see if there are any differences between the
Luotonen draft and the Fielding http/1.1 draft.

Given this situation, there's no particular reason to delay. Thus, I
would like to poll the working group to see if there is consensus to
accept 'draft-luotonen-http-url-byterange-02.txt' as the way in which
range retrieval should be done in HTTP/1.1.

What say you?
Received on Friday, 29 December 1995 13:22:52 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:38 EDT