W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1995

Re: Moving HTTP 1.0 to informational

From: Paul Hoffman <paulh@imc.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 1995 11:50:13 -0800
Message-Id: <v0214040bad0753918753@[]>
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
>> And, on a separate note, I'll be taking the "Allow" header out of the 1.0
>> doc since only one known server appears to emit it. Worse, that one server
>> does it incorrectly (it always emits GET HEAD POST even for URIs where POST
>> is not allowed...).
>That means there's at least three, because I know of two (AWS and
>AServe) that implement Allow and don't include POST where it is not

Spyglass also reports that they use the header, so I'll leave it in. This
was not true in September when I ran the survey. I'll be running another in
early January, I hope.

--Paul Hoffman
--Internet Mail Consortium
Received on Wednesday, 27 December 1995 11:52:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:15 UTC