W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1995

Re: Moving HTTP 1.0 to informational

From: Paul Hoffman <paulh@imc.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 1995 11:50:13 -0800
Message-Id: <v0214040bad0753918753@[165.227.10.43]>
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
>> And, on a separate note, I'll be taking the "Allow" header out of the 1.0
>> doc since only one known server appears to emit it. Worse, that one server
>> does it incorrectly (it always emits GET HEAD POST even for URIs where POST
>> is not allowed...).
>
>That means there's at least three, because I know of two (AWS and
>AServe) that implement Allow and don't include POST where it is not
>allowed.

Spyglass also reports that they use the header, so I'll leave it in. This
was not true in September when I ran the survey. I'll be running another in
early January, I hope.

--Paul Hoffman
--Internet Mail Consortium
Received on Wednesday, 27 December 1995 11:52:18 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:38 EDT