- From: Mike Meyer <mwm@contessa.phone.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 1995 10:52:26 PST
- To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
> And, on a separate note, I'll be taking the "Allow" header out of the 1.0 > doc since only one known server appears to emit it. Worse, that one server > does it incorrectly (it always emits GET HEAD POST even for URIs where POST > is not allowed...). That means there's at least three, because I know of two (AWS and AServe) that implement Allow and don't include POST where it is not allowed. I don't know of any CLIENTS that pay attention to the Allow header, though, which would also imply that it should come out of the draft. <mike
Received on Wednesday, 27 December 1995 11:03:35 UTC