W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1995

Re: Logic Bag concerns (with some proposals)

From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 13:27:39 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199512041227.MAA28286@wsooti14.win.tue.nl>
To: Shel Kaphan <sjk@amazon.com>
Cc: koen@win.tue.nl, fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU, mogul@pa.dec.com, dmk@allegra.att.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Shel Kaphan:
>Koen Holtman writes:
>	...
> >  Another question: what is the
> > `appropriate comparison function' server authors are supposed to use
> > for `Content-Version'?  Do we really want to open this can of worms?
>If Content-Version is going to be used to hold an opaque identifier,
>then the only appropriate comparison operators are `eq' and `ne'.

I agree that the only approprate version comparison operators are `eq'
and `ne'.  My point was that, in my reading of the 1.1 spec, server
authors would also be required to think up an `appropriate' `gt'
comparison function.


Received on Monday, 4 December 1995 04:33:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:15 UTC