W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1995

Re: Revised Charter

From: Dave Kristol <dmk@allegra.att.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 95 16:59:03 EST
Message-Id: <199511012237.AA299415471@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: efrank@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
  > From research!cuckoo.hpl.hp.com!http-wg-request  Wed Nov  1 16:44:42 1995
  > Received: from research by allegra.tempo.att.com; id AA14310; Wed, 1 Nov 95 16:44:35 EST
  > Received: by research.att.com; Wed Nov  1 16:40 EST 1995
  > Received: from cuckoo.hpl.hp.com by hplb.hpl.hp.com; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 21:35:02 GMT
  > Received: from http-wglistexploder by cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
  > 	(1.37.109.16/15.6+ISC) id AA120731617; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 21:33:37 GMT
  > From: efrank@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Beth Frank)
  > Message-Id: <9511012132.AA08535@void.ncsa.uiuc.edu>
  > Subject: Re: Revised Charter
  > To: mcmanus@nysernet.org (Pat McManus)
  > Date: Wed, 1 Nov 1995 15:32:29 -0600 (CST)
  > Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
  > In-Reply-To: <199511012120.QAA11914@pat.nyser.net> from "Pat McManus" at Nov 1, 95 04:20:13 pm
  > X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
  > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
  > Sender: http-wg-request@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
  > Status: R
  > 
  > > 
  > > In a previous episode...Beth Frank said:
  > > -> > 
  > > -> > Dave Raggett writes:
  > > -> >  > 
  > > -> >  > Its time to revise the charter for the HTTP working group, to bring it
  > > -> >  > into line with the group's planned activities.  The following reflects
  > > -> >  > my understanding, as HTTP-WG chairman, of our current work commitments.
  > > -> > 	...
  > > -> > 
  > > -> > The list looks pretty good to me, but I'd also like to see the following
  > > -> > on it:
  > > -> > 
  > > -> > - state management  (for example, the state-info proposal by Dave Kristol)
  > > -> <Rest of Shel's message cut>
  > > -> 
  > > -> I'd like to second the addition of state management.  Our initial develop
  > > 
  > > While extraneous 'me toos' are annoying I'm going to vocalize my
  > > support for including state identification in the 1.1 document. 
  > > There has been substantial discussion of this already and some Dave's
  > > proposals provided a good start for formalization, add that to NCSA's
  > > interest and I think a 'the sooner the better' philosophy is in order.
  > > 
  > > -Patrick McManus
  > > NYSERNet, Information Services
  > > 
  >  
efrank@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Beth Frank) wrote:
  > Where would I find the past discussion of state management and Dave's
  > proposals?  I'm going to writing up an internal discussion of our requirements
  > for managing state and sessions and I'd like review other relevant information.

I found www-talk archived at
	http://www.eit.com/cgi-bin/textit/goodies/lists/www.lists/index.html
Most of the action took place July-Sept 1995.

You can find information about the State-Info proposal at
	http://www.research.att.com/~dmk/session.html

Dave Kristol
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 1995 14:40:44 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:34 EDT