Jeff said: ] Actually, I would probably combine #1 and #2 into ] Expires: value < deskewed current time ] given that the Date: value serves as a lower bound on the "current time" ] when it is received. When I wrote "Expires: <yesterday>" what I really ] meant was "Expires: some time obviously in the past"; I don't think ] we need to pick a particular distinguished value. In fact, we probably ] ought not to pick a particular value, since it can only lead to one ] more possible bug in an implementation. I was listing the three ways that it seemed the spec would allow based on current list thinking. I was objecting to there being three ways. I agree with combining 1 & 2, and eliminating "max-age" -- it is completely redundant. That would also get rid of any ciunter=intuitive "Expires: <yesterday>" distinguished value. PaulReceived on Thursday, 7 September 1995 09:14:25 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:31 EDT