> Though I generally agree with what you're saying, there's a slight > problem with this, I think. If the first GET on a URL has side > effects necessary to the semantics intended by the server, then it has > to avoid being served from a cache. How'd it get into the cache if it was never GET-ed in the first place? Immaculate HTML?Received on Wednesday, 30 August 1995 12:05:54 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:26 EDT