W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1995

Re: Comments on draft-v10-03a.

From: Paul Hoffman <ietf-lists@proper.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 09:11:37 -0700
Message-Id: <v02130505ac6a3d856acc@[165.227.40.27]>
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com

>Idempotent

I second the request for a clear definition in the context of this spec.
Another good reason for this: idempotent is not in any dictionary
(including my Webster's unabridged) that I could find.

Received on Wednesday, 30 August 1995 09:11:56 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: John Franks: "Re: Comments on draft-v10-03a."
Previous message: Rich Salz: "Re: Comments on draft-v10-03a."
Maybe in reply to: Koen Holtman: "Comments on draft-v10-03a."
Next in thread: John Franks: "Re: Comments on draft-v10-03a."
Reply: John Franks: "Re: Comments on draft-v10-03a."
Reply: Shel Kaphan: "Re: Comments on draft-v10-03a."

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:14 UTC