Why would a server pumping out bogus last-modified headers act appropriately to another type of check? Adding something to the protocol just because another part is not being used properly seems a bit weird. If I'm understanding the problem correctly. Will the "size" be determined from the Content-length header or the size on the cache's disk? If the former, documents with incorrect content-length headers are essentially uncacheable, as are results from CGI scripts which generally don't have content-length headers. If the latter, could there be encoding problems? Brian --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/Received on Monday, 14 August 1995 21:06:56 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:24 EDT