W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1995

Re: Improving If-Modified-Since

From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 21:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
To: Alex Hopmann <hopmann@holonet.net>
Cc: Lou Montulli <montulli@mozilla.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950814205912.5767W-100000@eat.organic.com>

Why would a server pumping out bogus last-modified headers act appropriately
to another type of check?  Adding something to the protocol just because
another part is not being used properly seems a bit weird.  If I'm 
understanding the problem correctly.

Will the "size" be determined from the Content-length header or the size on
the cache's disk?  If the former, documents with incorrect content-length
headers are essentially uncacheable, as are results from CGI scripts which
generally don't have content-length headers.  If the latter, could there 
be encoding problems?

	Brian

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com  brian@hyperreal.com  http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/
Received on Monday, 14 August 1995 21:06:56 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:24 EDT