W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1995

Re: Proposal: Checksum header or method

From: John Franks <john@math.nwu.edu>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 09:31:35 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199507271431.JAA16551@hopf.math.nwu.edu>
To: "Mordechai T. Abzug" <mabzug1@gl.umbc.edu>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
According to Mordechai T. Abzug:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 1995 Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no wrote:
> > The content-MD5 document, RFC 1544, describes exactly such a header.
> > Is this what you are looking for?
> Yes.  However, it's optional, and in fact, I've never seen it included
> with any HTTP-generated header.  It would be nice if such a mechanism were
> formally included as part of the reply to a HEAD request, not for purposes
> of error-chjecking, but merely to know if the document has changed. 

Are there servers that produce an incorrect last modified date for
files?  I don't know of any, but if they exist then they are broken
and the proper solution is to have them fixed.  Of course the last
modified date for a CGI script may be problematical, but I don't see
how checksums could help this.

John Franks
Received on Thursday, 27 July 1995 07:37:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:14 UTC