W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1995

Re: Content-Transfer-Encoding "packet"

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 1995 22:00:22 PDT
To: fielding@beach.w3.org
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <95Jul24.220031pdt.2762@golden.parc.xerox.com>
I became a convert to the 'boundary' method for delimiting otherwise
unbounded data, as is done with multipart/* messages. E.g.,

content-transfer-encoding: bounded-binary; boundary="xxxxxx"

would signal that the actual data started with


and ended with


This is simple for both the sender and recipient; the packetized
encodings seem messy. I'd worry that we'd need an
'accept-transfer-encoding' to allow negotiation of CTE, though.
Received on Monday, 24 July 1995 22:01:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:14 UTC