W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1995

Re: Worries about content-length

From: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Date: Mon, 08 May 95 15:05:07 MDT
Message-Id: <9505082205.AA24404@acetes.pa.dec.com>
To: Ned Freed <NED@sigurd.innosoft.com>
Cc: jag@scndprsn.eng.sun.com, masinter@parc.xerox.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
    Actually, I see it the other way around, with byte stuffing being
    the hack and unique boundaries as the cleanest way to do it. I also
    disagree about it being simpler -- byte stuffing requires that you
    diddle the stream as it is sent, which complicates your inner
    processing loop where you spend your time.  Boundaries keep that
    loop nice and simple.

I agree.  Consider what happens as the size of the user population
scales.  So you have 100 million users, all with mostly-idle Pentiums
on their desks, beating on your server (probably a multiprocessor
Alpha :-) ).

So, do you want that server to be byte-stuffing all the data streams?
Or would you rather leave the burden to the clients?  I know what
I would want to do.

Received on Monday, 8 May 1995 16:48:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:14 UTC