My apologies for cross-posting this, but it does apply to both standards. Albert Lunde wrote: > In any case, I think the language attribute should have the same > allowed values as the language/dialect in the HTTP Accept-Language and > Content-Language headers. This has been changed for HTTP/1.0. We will now be using the language tag defined in <draft-ietf-mailext-lang-tag-02.txt> which will (hopefully) soon be an RFC. A full URL is <http://ds.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mailext-lang-tag-02.txt> Since it uses ISO 639 as primary tags, it should be compatible with current usage of language names. ......Roy Fielding ICS Grad Student, University of California, Irvine USA <fielding@ics.uci.edu> <URL:http://www.ics.uci.edu/dir/grad/Software/fielding>Received on Thursday, 9 February 1995 13:18:47 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:13 EDT