On Mon, 9 Jan 1995, Daniel W. Connolly wrote: > Why is this nifty proposal tucked away in a corner? Why didn't I hear > about it before now? I thought I was pretty tuned in to this sort of > thing... Eric from Spyglass posted to www-talk a proposal for using MD5 encryption in a system like this a few weeks ago - it looked solid, and I'm waiting for a server and a browser to implement it (WN and Arena maybe?) so I can set it up for HotWired. > The reason I believed this was that real security is to expensive to > develop to give away (and it almost always requires a license of some > kind...). Only until 1997! :) > This message is a call to eliminate passwords-in-the-clear from HTTP. > This means the browser developers should implement something like the > spyglass proposal (it looks like a few hours more work to upgrade to > this from the existing basic auth. scheme), and subscription-based > information providers should _strongly_ encourage their user base to > upgrade. Something like: > > "Please upgrade to a browser that doesn't send passwords in > the clear (such as... links to recommended browsers.). In 6 > months, we will not be accepting Basic authentication." rom a quick glance at the list of browsers used on our site, less than %2 are more than 4 months behind the current rev of their browser, so I don't see that as a huge issue. However the above statement implies that a server can negotiate which type of authentication can be used: S: Here's a challenge. Encrypt it. C: Huh? S: oh, nevermind. Send me your uuencoded password. C: okay, here goes.... ...which doesn't seem to be in the specs anywhere. I'd prefer not to have two separate URL's for different authentication schemes, though I could hack around that by keeping around a list of browsers implementing challenge-response. Brian --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- brian@hotwired.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.hotwired.com/Staff/brian/Received on Monday, 9 January 1995 12:36:23 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:13 EDT