Looking at IMS on a packet by packet basis, in the presence of possibly large headers greater than 512 bytes, having the client cancel will save 2 packets in the best case, and be no worse in the worst case. I sent a message on tis to www-talk during chicago with more analysis. my hands aren't up to recreating it at the moment, and I think the message dissapeared in transit. i'll see if i can find it again. s BOX-Line: From luotonen@neon.mcom.com Fri Dec 2 12:54:34 1994 Received: from cuckoo.hpl.hp.com by hplb.hpl.hp.com; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 20:52:46 GMT Received: from http-wg (list exploder) by cuckoo.hpl.hp.com (1.37.109.8/15.6+ISC) id AA24980; Fri, 2 Dec 1994 20:53:52 GMT From: Ari Luotonen <luotonen@neon.mcom.com> Message-Id: <9412022054.AA15651@neon.mcom.com> Subject: Re: Comments on HTTP draft [of 23 Nov 1994] To: Simon E Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 1994 12:54:15 -0800 (PST) Cc: fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU, cshotton@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com In-Reply-To: <9412022023.AA14914@tipper.oit.unc.edu> from "Simon E Spero" at Dec 2, 94 03:23:56 pm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: http-wg-request@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com > Looking at IMS on a packet by packet basis, in the presence of > possibly large headers greater than 512 bytes, having the client > cancel will save 2 packets in the best case, and be no worse in the > worst case. I sent a message on tis to www-talk during chicago with > more analysis. my hands aren't up to recreating it at the moment, > and I think the message dissapeared in transit. i'll see if i can > find it again. Well, did you monitor the impact on the server's TCP kernel when that is constantly happening? Basically what you're suggesting is very ugly anyway, and I don't like it one bit even if it wasn't expensive for the network. Gee, it's a few lines of code to do it cleanly. It's like smashing your car on a signpost because you don't feel like hitting the brakes. -- Cheers, Ari --Received on Friday, 2 December 1994 12:26:45 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:08 EDT