W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1994

Re: Comments on the HTTP/1.0 draft.

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 1994 18:16:43 -0800
To: Chuck Shotton <cshotton@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu>
Cc: Marc VanHeyningen <mvanheyn@cs.indiana.edu>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <9412011816.aa01499@paris.ics.uci.edu>
Chuck Shotton writes:

> IMHO, it should state that CR, LF, and CRLF should all be interpreted
> equally as EOL when used as line ends. This avoids any problems with
> machine dependent EOL symbols, and fairly represents the current practice.
> (It also avoids forcing clients and especially servers to do line-by-line
> translations of EOL for all outgoing response information, which is a BIG
> performance hit.)

Sounds reasonable to me.


......Roy Fielding   ICS Grad Student, University of California, Irvine  USA
                                     <fielding@ics.uci.edu>
                     <URL:http://www.ics.uci.edu/dir/grad/Software/fielding>
Received on Thursday, 1 December 1994 18:18:25 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:31:08 EDT