RE: mandatory / extensions / options

From: Josh Cohen (joshco@microsoft.com)
Date: Mon, Mar 23 1998


Message-ID: <8B57882C41A0D1118F7100805F9F68B5CB8B5A@red-msg-45.dns.microsoft.com>
From: Josh Cohen <joshco@microsoft.com>
To: "'Marc Slemko'" <marcs@znep.com>, Josh Cohen <joshco@microsoft.com>
Cc: "'ietf-http-ext@w3.org'" <ietf-http-ext@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 15:55:03 -0800
Subject: RE: mandatory / extensions / options

thats what I thought..
(www.lag.net is my own server)
Trying 204.62.130.149 port 80...
Connected to www.apache.org.
GET http://www.apache.org/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.apache.org

HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 23:54:25 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3b6-dev
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html

<HTML><HEAD>
<TITLE>400 Bad Request</TITLE>
</HEAD><BODY>
<H1>Bad Request</H1>
Your browser sent a request that
this server could not understand.<P>
</BODY></HTML>
Remote server has closed connection
Connection closed by foreign host.             

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Slemko [mailto:marcs@znep.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 1998 1:13 PM
> To: Josh Cohen
> Cc: 'ietf-http-ext@w3.org'
> Subject: RE: mandatory / extensions / options
> 
> 
> On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Josh Cohen wrote:
> 
> > doing a 
> > GET http://www.lag.net/ HTTP/1.1
> > host: www.lag.net
> 
> Almost certainly some configuration problem.  My first guess 
> would be that
> they have a proxy configured, have access restrictions enabled for the
> proxy, yet haven't configured their server to know that it is 
> www.lag.net
> so it thinks it is a proxy request and denies it.
> 
> www.apache.org is probably better to use for such purposes, 
> or just get
> your own copy.
> 
> > 
> > fails.
> > I thought this was a 1.1 requirement..
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Marc Slemko [mailto:marcs@znep.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, March 23, 1998 11:50 AM
> > > To: Josh Cohen
> > > Cc: 'ietf-http-ext@w3.org'
> > > Subject: Re: mandatory / extensions / options
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Josh Cohen wrote:
> > > 
> > > >  low level:
> > > >   (answered by 'core' server )
> > > [..]
> > > >   "do you understand full URIs"
> > > >      (currently, apache is 1.1, but does not accept full URLS)
> > > 
> > > Hmm?  What do you mean by that?
> > > 
> > 
> 
>