Re: [Fwd: another possible ietf-http-ext work item: proxy cookies ]

From: Rohit Khare (rohit@bordeaux.ics.uci.edu)
Date: Mon, Mar 23 1998

Next message: Jeffrey Mogul: "Re: mandatory / extensions / options"
Previous message: Dave Kristol: "Re: [Fwd: another possible ietf-http-ext work item: proxy cookies ]"
In reply to: Woodhouse, Gregory J.: "RE: [Fwd: another possible ietf-http-ext work item: proxy cookies ]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

To: "Woodhouse, Gregory J." <gregory.woodhouse@med.va.gov>
cc: ietf-http-ext@w3.org
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 13:37:00 -0800
From: Rohit Khare <rohit@bordeaux.ics.uci.edu>
Message-ID:  <9803231337.aa26277@paris.ics.uci.edu>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: another possible ietf-http-ext work item: proxy cookies ] 

I'd like to chirp up on Dave's point: proxy cookies are very useful for proxy 
apps which *do* transform content. Which language, for a language-translator; 
which-profile for a content-filtering scheme, and so on. One current 
work-around is proxy-authentication (e.g. Lucent's anonymizer), but cookies, 
now that we have them, seem like a better solution. 

A whole bunch of examples of "active proxies" are in this paper:

http://www.cs.caltech.edu/~adam/papers/csa98b

Rohit

Next message: Jeffrey Mogul: "Re: mandatory / extensions / options"
Previous message: Dave Kristol: "Re: [Fwd: another possible ietf-http-ext work item: proxy cookies ]"
In reply to: Woodhouse, Gregory J.: "RE: [Fwd: another possible ietf-http-ext work item: proxy cookies ]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]