Re: "end-to-end" headers in HTTP/1.1 [was Re: Mandatory]

From: David W. Morris (dwm@xpasc.com)
Date: Fri, Apr 17 1998


Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 10:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David W. Morris" <dwm@xpasc.com>
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
cc: Ted Hardie <hardie@thornhill.arc.nasa.gov>, mogul@pa.dec.com, hardie@nic.nasa.gov, ietf-http-ext@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980417103647.23758G-100000@shell1.aimnet.com>
Subject: Re: "end-to-end" headers in HTTP/1.1 [was Re: Mandatory]



On Sat, 18 Apr 1998, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
 
> - everything else which we often call end-to-end. 

I continue to disagree with the notion that we (the HTTP-WG community) use
'end-to-end' to refer to 'everything else'. There will be much less
confusion of the 'mandatory' specification uses a different term.

Dave Morris