- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1998 18:08:14 +0900
- To: koen@win.tue.nl (Koen Holtman)
- Cc: ietf-http-ext@w3.org
At 20:28 3/26/98 +0100, Koen Holtman wrote: >I just realised that you also may want to forbid man: headers in 304 >responses altogether as they may overwrite an already-existing man >header in the cached entry. But 304 already SHOULD NOT contain any new header fields - exactly for the sake of consistency. Why is this different for Man than for any other header? Henrik -- Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org/People/Frystyk
Received on Saturday, 11 April 1998 04:40:08 UTC