- From: Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 19:12:40 -0800
- To: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
- Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org
> Except for STUN and (perhaps) other MIDCOM WG items, and except in > IPSec-over-UDP and -TCP which exist primarily to better traverse NATs. So, > perhaps the wording should be something like "unless expressly designed, > IETF protocols are only guaranteed without NATs". or, if your application is connection-oriented, just use BEEP and stop caring as to whether there's a NAT (or a load-balancer or a ...) or not... /mtr
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 23:30:12 UTC