Re: Requirements for reliable message delivery

Keith Moore wrote:
> 
> > Exactly. We can all agree on this. So given that fact, and the fact that
> > people do want to reliably transfer hypertext across unreliable,
> > non-transparent and intermittently connected networks, what should we do?
> 
> We should explain why it doesn't make good sense to do these things,
> and provide alternatives that do make sense.

Wait a minute. I'd love it if the network was reliable, transparent
and connected 100% of the time, but it isn't. We have to deal with that.

  Brian

Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2001 10:37:23 UTC