> > I'm wondering if people have had a chance to look at this draft. > > It describes a gap that probably needs filling. > The instance on HTTP is bogus. A much better starting point for this would be xxxxxxxx^insistance > APEX, which already meets most of the requirements given here and could easily > be extended to meet the remainder. > The assessment given of BEEP is also bogus, since BEEP is a protocol framework, > not an application protocol per se. > NedReceived on Tuesday, 20 November 2001 13:16:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 23 March 2006 20:11:29 GMT