Re: canonical MIME headers

> I just know I'm going to feel dumb when you point out the obvious but
> frankly I don't get your point at all.
> 
> I've just finished processing the "preceding" header so I've got the
> boundary marker and now I'm moving through the content.  I simply
> substitute some standard string for digest purposes for every boundary
> marker as I come across it.

yes, I think this is doable.

Keith