- From: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 19:50:15 -0800 (PST)
- To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Cc: ned.freed@mrochek.com, Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, James M Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>, discuss@apps.ietf.org
> Seems like it would also be fairly easy to abstract out multipart > separators so as to be immune from them being re-written. The problem is that the separator is buried in the preceeding header. Handling that correctly ups the complexity considerability. IMO the added complexity isn't worth it. Ned
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2001 22:52:48 UTC