Re: multipart/alternative extension

• From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
• Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 14:42:25 -0400
• To: pkyone@netreon.com
• cc: Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se>, IETF Applications Area general discussion list <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
• Message-Id: <200105071842.OAA22666@astro.cs.utk.edu>

> If IETF says that multipart/alternative should be used, such
> a server will still not use it, since using multipart/alternative
> will cause many recipients to only get one of the translations,
> not adapted to their language capabilities. 

The same is true if you use either multipart/mixed or multipart/choices.

Keith

Received on Monday, 7 May 2001 14:43:42 UTC