> > and you've been in the IDN discussion so you should also be familiar > > with those issues. > > The IDN discussion has produced a requirements memo that states, inter > alia, that the IDN requirements memo is irrelevant. the discussions on the IDN list have repeatedly focused on the problems of names in multiple character sets, translation of those names to a common format, canonicalization of those names, encoding of those names in ASCII to make them safe for existing applications, comparison of those names, etc. the notion that an application that actually uses domain names as protocol elements can be fixed by simply making it 8bit clean has been soundly and repeatedly refuted. the issues for email addresses are not identical, but are quite similar. I'm sure they will be revisited in due time by applications area groups, but that time is after the IDN group has finished its work. we'll have to have those discussions then anyway, just to bring everybody up to speed. so there's no sense in our having them now. folks who are interested are welcome to read the IDN list archives or join that discussion. KeithReceived on Thursday, 28 June 2001 13:06:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 23 March 2006 20:11:28 GMT