W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-discuss@w3.org > December 2001

Re: Requirements for reliable message delivery

From: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 16:41:29 +0100
Message-Id: <3C1A1DA9.1E2FCD4A@hursley.ibm.com>
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, janssen@parc.xerox.com, discuss@apps.ietf.org
Mark Baker wrote:
> > if the design of the web is to coerce everything into one protocol,
> > it's fundamentally broken.    perhaps that was the intent, but
> > I'm happy that things didn't work out that way.
> Not "everythng", just "lots of things".
> Do you see a problem with my example?

I can't see any basic reason why a thermostat should be accessed as if
it was a hypertext document. I would expect building-services control
messages to get layered directly over a transport protocol in due 
course. I certainly want thermostats to be accessed by a highly reliable
mechanism that survives disconnected operation, which is where this
thread started.

Received on Friday, 14 December 2001 10:42:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:38:01 UTC