W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-discuss@w3.org > December 2000

Re: 3GPP-T-WG3 codecs

From: Henning Timcke <henning.timcke@werft22.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 08:41:17 +0100
Message-ID: <3A37281D.9C896F7B@werft22.com>
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
CC: Andrew Daviel <andrew@daviel.org>, discuss@apps.ietf.org, www-smil@w3.org, "'Philipp Hoschka'" <ph@w3.org>
How should this 3 - Layer Architecture respond to bandwidth issues
and route selection ?


Henning 

Patrik Fältström wrote:
> 
> At 13.17 -0800 00-12-11, Andrew Daviel wrote:
> >WAV seems to be the defacto standard, though I confess that there seem to
> >be many flavours and it is at heart a proprietary format. MP3, anyone ?
> 
> Do we have someone reading these messages which can let me know if I
> am right or wrong when claiming that we talk about a sort of three
> layer architecture:
> 
>     Codec
>     Format
>   Transport
> 
> In the case of Waw, that is not a codec, but a format, which allow
> different codecs.
> 
> ????
> 
> Has anyone seen any compilation on what various "words" actually mean?
> 
>      paf
> 
> --
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2000 02:49:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:38:00 UTC